<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Image Composite Editor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kuanhoong.com/2008/09/25/microsoft-image-composite-editor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kuanhoong.com/2008/09/25/microsoft-image-composite-editor/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimization, Internet Marketing, Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 03:43:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James G.</title>
		<link>http://www.kuanhoong.com/2008/09/25/microsoft-image-composite-editor/comment-page-1/#comment-2064</link>
		<dc:creator>James G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 10:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kuanhoong.com/2008/09/25/microsoft-image-composite-editor/#comment-2064</guid>
		<description>I have two points. Then I&#039;ll leave.

When did microsoft get into the artsy fartsy game? I mean, photoshop CS3 has an awesome layer auto align tool, and auto blend tool, and MS comes out with this to compete? I&#039;ll give it a try, and hope it runs under wine. (yes I know &quot;hope&quot; that&#039;s a kick in my own crotch for my next statement.) But c&#039;mon the best thing they came out with for artsy stuff was MSPaint!!!

Why doesn&#039;t microsoft stay trying to do their best at something that is failing horribly? Vista? The joke of an OS since windows ME? Epic LOL. Ok, not so epic, but a lol none the less. My point is, if you&#039;re going to compete at something, don&#039;t make a onesy tool, because you&#039;re fading away. (onsey tool I mean, it doesn&#039;t come from a bigger all-knowing program like PS-CS3) Granted I may use the software. But why not work on the problems that lie in your software already? Instead of trying to mask it, like calling it &quot;Mojave&quot; and pawning it off over some half wit people who don&#039;t know how to use a computer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have two points. Then I&#8217;ll leave.</p>
<p>When did microsoft get into the artsy fartsy game? I mean, photoshop CS3 has an awesome layer auto align tool, and auto blend tool, and MS comes out with this to compete? I&#8217;ll give it a try, and hope it runs under wine. (yes I know &#8220;hope&#8221; that&#8217;s a kick in my own crotch for my next statement.) But c&#8217;mon the best thing they came out with for artsy stuff was MSPaint!!!</p>
<p>Why doesn&#8217;t microsoft stay trying to do their best at something that is failing horribly? Vista? The joke of an OS since windows ME? Epic LOL. Ok, not so epic, but a lol none the less. My point is, if you&#8217;re going to compete at something, don&#8217;t make a onesy tool, because you&#8217;re fading away. (onsey tool I mean, it doesn&#8217;t come from a bigger all-knowing program like PS-CS3) Granted I may use the software. But why not work on the problems that lie in your software already? Instead of trying to mask it, like calling it &#8220;Mojave&#8221; and pawning it off over some half wit people who don&#8217;t know how to use a computer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

